December 5, 2023
RQW 5SO FMA 7TL BWP 7YM 54Q N59 MOX 9W3 QXP M9M VST 2C9 5D4 IXN 56E 3JF PS8 MWM B5H CPZ WLL OTX 7MW O4B V0Y W4G 6NC R1K TV7 NST Q06 B6O XNP ALD 2TQ FJE 8I8 0P1 8G7 7HT D1W JO9 C5T FS6 LHP ZXC PXK 2L5 3ZP QWO 8QR 1B6 9GV UUR K9N

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to allow Florida to enforce its law preventing children from being exposed to adult, sexually explicit performances such as drag shows.

In a 6-3 action, the high court declined Florida’s request to reverse a district court ruling that blocked its law from being enforced — not just against the restaurant that sued, but statewide. The lower court said the law infringed on the restaurant’s First Amendment rights.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil M. Gorsuch and Samuel A. Alito Jr. would have granted Florida’s request to enforce the law while another court challenge to it is playing out.



Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, who was joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, wrote that the state’s legal filing didn’t focus on the First Amendment argument, but over the breadth of the district court’s order. The state disagreed with the district court issuing a statewide order instead of just issuing a decision protecting the plaintiff, an Orlando restaurant.

“The issue arises here in the context of a First Amendment overbreadth challenge, which presents its own doctrinal complexities about the scope of relief. This case is therefore an imperfect vehicle for considering the general question of whether a district court may enjoin a government from enforcing a law against nonparties to the litigation,” wrote Justice Kavanaugh.

Part of the legislation at issue, Florida’s Protection of Children Act, penalizes restaurants and establishments that expose children to sexually explicit shows.

It was signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis in May and prevents anyone from knowingly allowing a minor to enter a venue where there is an adult performance. A venue may lose its license if it violates the law. 

Hamburger Mary’s, an Orlando restaurant that has drag shows, sued claiming the law runs afoul of the First Amendment. 

A lower court in June agreed earlier this year and blocked the law from being enforced.

The state appealed that ruling, which is currently pending at the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.